The Washington Times 2005

Washington Times 2005 News

Obscuring license plates adds up to fines
By Matthew Cella
Published May 2, 2005

The District is cracking down on drivers who obscure their license plates from the city’s cameras. officers have begun enforcing a new law that has raised fines from $50 to $500 for using “glass, plastic, or any other type of material or substance (i.e. spray) to cover a license plate.” The law took effect earlier this month, but officials could not determine how many fines have been issued under the statute.

The new fine dwarfs the $55 fine for a similar offense in Maryland and the $25 fine for a similar offense in Virginia. Janis Hazel, spokeswoman for the city’s Department of Motor Vehicles, said asked for the increased fines to “put some teeth” into restrictions on obstructing license plates. The new law clarifies an older statute that said license plates “shall be maintained free from foreign materials and in clearly legible condition.”

“Too many people out there are getting objects that obstruct or distort their plates,” said Lt. Byron Hope, head of the department’s safety office. Lt. Hope said violation of the new law is a “primary charge,” meaning officers can stop violators for no other reason than having obscured plates. The new law is aimed at motorists who apply or install products on their license plates that “obscure [plates] from photo-radar cameras or being able to adequately see or identify a vehicle,” Miss Hazel said. While clear or tinted license-plate shields are easy to detect, other products, such as spray-on applications designed to thwart cameras likely still will present problems for .

Manufacturers of one product, a canned spray called PhotoBlocker, say their product places hyperreflective covers over license plates that make them unreadable when cameras flash. The spray, marketed by online merchant PhantomPlate (, costs $29.99. Joe Scott, marketing director for PhantomPlate, said the intent of the product is to “fight unjust tickets.” He said he is not concerned about the new law.

“They are not making it illegal to buy it or sell it,” Mr. Scott said. “It’s good marketing for us. It was hard for us to convince people the product worked, even with all the tests. Why would they make it illegal if it didn’t work?”Mr. Scott said that the company has sold 30,000 cans of PhotoBlocker and that he has never heard a complaint that detected the spray applied to a license plate.

“It’s a high-gloss, clear, reflective finish,” he said. “They won’t know.”

Lt. Hope agreed that the spray is difficult to detect.
“From the ones I’ve seen, unless you get up close and see a film, no, you can’t, [detect it]” Lt. Hope said.

Related Posts
Delaware News Journal

Delaware News Journal

License covers could cancel out red-light cameras Wilmington considers outlawing plate-obscuring devices sold on the Internet By ADAM TAYLOR Staff News

Firm steps up to the plate… Posted on Mon, Oct. 14, 2002 … to obscure car tags from cameras By

Weekly Standard News

The Weekly Standard

Inside the District’s Red Lights Red-light cameras are all over Washington–and coming to a city near you. The science behind

Winnipeg Free Press News

Winnipeg Free Press

Camera-beaters illegal Monday, January 6th, 2003 Here’s a sample of devices to thwart photo enforcement. Be warned, though: Such contraptions



Trafikmagasinet = is the name of a car program that keeps the Swedish society updated with the latest car news,

Daily Mail News

Daily Mail News

The number plate spray that claims it defeats cameras Friday July 4, 2003 From George Gordon in New York A

Washington Times News

The Washington Times

License-plate spray foils cameras By Steve Sexton THE WASHINGTON TIMES Motorists have litigated against them, fired bullets at them and

Chicago Sun Times News

Chicago Sun Times

Reflective license plate spray beats camera tickets in a flash Thursday, July 3, 2003 Hate the idea of impersonal cameras

NOTE: In some states it is unlawful to display on any vehicle a registration plate which is obscured in any manner which inhibits the proper operation of an automated red light enforcement system.Jacky Casteel, (WATE) Knoxville, Channel 6